Chris Banescu | February 3, 2010
Investor’s Business Daily | Feb. 1, 2010
The latest index of economic freedom shows America falling fast, being ranked for the first time as “mostly free.” We’ve fallen behind Canada, and it’s look out below.
Our accelerating descent into a command-and-control economy with government pulling the strings is taking its toll.
The Heritage Foundation’s 2010 index of leading economic indicators shows that the land of the free is only mostly free, falling to eighth in the world from sixth last year, now sandwiched between Canada and Denmark. more »
Spread the word!
| Chris Banescu |
Competitiveness, Economics |
Print
|
Email
|
Chris Banescu | January 27, 2010
Townhall | by Ed Feulner | Jan. 26, 2010
When future historians characterize this era, chances are they won’t label it as America’s “golden age.” Indeed, they may well mark 2010 as the year the United States became the home of the “mostly free.”
That’s the finding of the latest “Index of Economic Freedom,” an annual compendium published by The Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal.
The U.S. earned an overall score of 78 out of a possible 100 points in the Index. That was good enough for eighth place, globally. But that score was down 2.7 points from last year’s. It’s the biggest drop recorded among the world’s 20 largest economies. The decline was comparable to Venezuela’s (down 2.8) and Yemen’s (down 2.5), two poster children for bad economic behavior. more »
Spread the word!
| Chris Banescu |
Economic Freedom, Government, Economics |
Print
|
Email
|
Chris Banescu | January 22, 2010
FT | Review by John Gapper | Jan. 22, 2010
Crash Course: The American Automobile Industry’s Road from Glory to Disaster - by Paul Ingrassia
Japanese car companies, which overtook US ones in the early 21st century, leading to the bankruptcy of General Motors and Chrysler last year, used a method of industrial innovation called kaizen, usually translated as “continuous improvement”. From a humble start, the Japanese companies had got better and better at making cars that were economical and reliable.
Meanwhile, Detroit perfected the technique of occasional improvement. As the Big Three – GM, Ford and Chrysler – slid deeper into trouble over decades of complacency, union obstructionism and mismanagement, they would occasionally stage a temporary recovery, with some new car or initiative prompting books and magazine articles about a Detroit revival. more »
Spread the word!
| Chris Banescu |
Competitiveness, Book Reviews |
Print
|
Email
|
Chris Banescu | January 11, 2010
Investor’s Business Daily | by Thomas Sowell | Jan. 8, 2010
Most intellectuals outside the field of economics show remarkably little interest in learning even the basic fundamentals of economics. Yet they do not hesitate to make sweeping pronouncements about the economy in general, businesses in particular, and the many issues revolving around what is called “income distribution.”
Famed novelist John Steinbeck, for example, commented on the many American fortunes which have been donated to philanthropic causes by saying:
One has only to remember some of the wolfish financiers who spent two thirds of their lives clawing a fortune out of the guts of society and the latter third pushing it back.
more »
Spread the word!
| Chris Banescu |
Economics, Capitalism, Taxation |
Print
|
Email
|
Chris Banescu | January 8, 2010
American Thinker | by Thomas Sowell | Jan. 8, 2010
Politicians like Barack Obama try to make you believe that someone else will pay the tax he wants to impose. For example, President Obama said he will increase taxes only for those making more than $250,000 per year. Other politicians, at other times, have told us that we will tax corporations rather than individuals, or tax some other out-of-favor group or product (sin tax) rather than the majority of individuals or the general sales tax.
The problem is that in reality, the guy behind the tree is the vast majority of us…yes, the same people who were promised that they would not pay the proposed tax increase. This is quite easy to see in some examples. more »
Spread the word!
| Chris Banescu |
Government, Economics, Taxation |
Print
|
Email
|
Chris Banescu | December 11, 2009
Forbes | by Sramana Mitra | Dec. 11, 2009
America is in dire need of some breakthrough innovation that can crack open significant new horizons. Yet, every year, numerous corporate and academic labs spend millions working on projects that have no commercial future, no application, no real justification for their existence. At best, they represent the tinkering of a technologist with some cool ideas.
Against that backdrop, I recently spoke with Prith Banerjee, head of HP Labs, on Hewlett-Packard’s strategy to streamline innovation and make it relevant to real world problems. Banerjee, to set the stage, also has experience founding two electronics start-ups, and brings a good understanding of the entrepreneurship and venture capital worlds. more »
Spread the word!
| Chris Banescu |
Competitiveness, Innovation |
Print
|
Email
|
Chris Banescu | December 11, 2009
American Thinker | by Thomas Sowell | Dec. 8, 2009
President Obama keeps talking about the jobs his administration is “creating” but there are more people unemployed now than before he took office. How can there be more unemployment after so many jobs have been “created”?
Let’s go back to square one. What does it take to create a job? It takes wealth to pay someone who is hired, not to mention additional wealth to buy the material that person will use.
But government creates no wealth. Ignoring that plain and simple fact enables politicians to claim to be able to do all sorts of miraculous things that they cannot do in fact. Without creating wealth, how can they create jobs? By taking wealth from others, whether by taxation, selling bonds or imposing mandates. more »
Spread the word!
| Chris Banescu |
Government, Economics, Capitalism |
Print
|
Email
|
Chris Banescu | November 29, 2009
Forbes | by Joan Gurvis | Nov. 25, 2009
If having a balanced life was elusive in the fast-paced good times, it can seem impossible in the fast-paced tough times.
The pressures on leaders are huge. Distractions are everywhere. As work demands grow, our inclination is to continue to try to do more things more quickly, to fit everything in. We push ourselves, our co-workers and our employees to keep up the intense pace, but in so doing, we leave ourselves without adequate time to stop, reflect and focus. more »
Spread the word!
| Chris Banescu |
Work-Life, Leadership, Management |
Print
|
Email
|